Determine what information would be helpful to share at or in advance of the mediation.
The mediation process is initiated by contacting the mediator’s office and requesting available dates. Once a date is agreed upon, the mediator will oftentimes request a telephone conference to discuss the upcoming process, and will, generally, also request submission of mediation briefs from each party. Mediation briefs should contain enough legal and factual argument and supporting evidence for the mediator to fully understand the nature of the dispute.
When a Pre-mediation telephone conference is conducted, its goal is to:
- Introduce the participants and the mediator, and discuss the mediation process;
- Discuss unique issues which may affect opportunities for settlement;
- All parties understand the particular procedures the mediator intends to employ;
Historically, most mediation sessions started with a joint meeting (with all parties and their counsel in attendance). This initial meeting served to set an agenda, define the issues and ascertain the position and/or concerns of the parties. Sometimes, they were constructive; other times they were used solely as opportunities to overly-dramatize issues and/or the parties’ passion toward their own legal positions. Typically, neither of these uses was productive. Today, mediations are not so formulaic. In fact, an intuitive mediator can recognize when a joint session is unnecessary and/or when it will set a tone for the mediation that is not helpful. In these situations, the mediator may meet with the parties separately to discuss their thoughts about the benefits of a joint session, sometimes suggesting that the parties forgo the joint session altogether, in favor of moving directly to private caucuses. Ultimately, however, the parties are in charge of deciding whether they want a joint session and directing the mediator accordingly.
In a joint session, the mediator will explain the mediation process and ensure that all parties understand and agree to it. The mediator will also ensure that the parties understand the mediator's role in that process, the confidentiality associated with mediation disclosures and that the parties are voluntary participants. Thereafter, the parties, generally with the assistance of their counsel, will be given the opportunity to express their view of the case to the other participants and how they would like to approach settlement. These opening statements are intended to begin and to frame the settlement process, not to be unduly adversarial or merely a restatement of their positions. This session may last anywhere from a few minutes to many hours, depending on the number of participants and the complexity of the issues. The mediator can and often does offer suggestions regarding how to prepare for this session.
Following the joint session (or following separate initial meetings with the mediator, if no joint session occurs), the parties will separately caucus with the mediator. This allows each side to explain and enlarge upon his/her position and mediation goals in confidence. It also gives the mediator an opportunity to ask questions which may well serve to create doubt in an advocate's mind about the validity of a particular position.
In these caucuses, the mediator will help the parties reach a resolution by facilitating communication, promoting understanding, assisting them in identifying and exploring issues, interests and possible bases for agreement, and in some matters, helping parties evaluate the likely outcome in court or arbitration if they cannot reach settlement through mediation. Since the goal of mediation is, generally, to achieve a settlement of a disputed claim, each of the parties should have someone present who can make legally-binding decisions.
While a mediator serves as a facilitator more than an evaluator, he/she will often act as devil's advocate to explore how realistic and persuasive the positions of the participants are. The mediator often assists parties to prioritize interests and options for settlement, and to assess the relative strengths and weaknesses of their positions.
The mediator will often work with counsel to finalize a settlement agreement and determine the procedures necessary for implementation. Once settlement is achieved, the mediator will help the parties record its terms and prepare it for signature immediately, so as to prevent second thoughts from destroying an otherwise beneficial agreement. If it appears that a settlement cannot occur on the day of the mediation session, the mediator may propose settlement terms and ask the parties to consider and/or accept that proposal by a definite date thereafter. In some situations, the mediator and parties will set a further mediation session, perhaps after the parties have had an opportunity to further evaluate their positions and/or conduct more fact-finding and/or legal motion work.
The mediator will often work with counsel to finalize a settlement agreement and determine the procedures necessary for implementation. Once settlement is achieved, the mediator will help the parties record its terms and prepare it for signature immediately, so as to prevent second thoughts from destroying an otherwise beneficial agreement. If it appears that a settlement cannot occur on the day of the mediation session, the mediator may propose settlement terms and ask the parties to consider and/or accept that proposal by a definite date thereafter. In some situations, the mediator and parties will set a further mediation session, perhaps after the parties have had an opportunity to further evaluate their positions and/or conduct more fact-finding and/or legal motion work.
For more information and/or to schedule a mediation session, please call our office at (510) 891-9800 or submit an e-mail to mediations@scalaw.com.